June 14, 2012

By Tom Shevlin

NEWPORT – City Council members on Wednesday derided a decision by the School Committee to hire a business manager as counterproductive to efforts to consolidate services between departments.

The decision by the school follows the receipt of a scathing report that highlighted serious deficiencies within the School Department's finance system.

When the school department received the report last week, Business Manager John Miley promptly resigned, leaving the position vacant effective June 30.

Quickly filling that position, the school committee on Tuesday unanimously approved a contract to hire Joan Tracey, the City of Newport’s Deputy Finance Director from the utilities department.

However, speaking during a hearing on the council's proposed FY2013 budget, Mayor Stephen C. Waluk said that he was "profoundly disappointed in the School Department and the School Committee" for a  move that he said seemed to undermine the city's work to achieve more efficiencies in government.

"This council, over the past 18 months, has taken a very active and aggressive stance that the City of Newport's finances – both the city side and the school side – should be governed by the City of Newport's finance department," Waluk said, noting that the school department had seemed willing to work toward a common end.

"While the School Committee did take action to offer our finance department control over their finance department, they also took the action to hire a full-time business manager that had been vacant, that should have remained vacant, and should have allowed the city to reconfigure the finance department so that it works," he added. "Our city finance department works. Their process is broken."

He went on: "Instead of doing what they said they were going to do… They filled a position that should have remained vacant and in my opinion, completely undercut anything that we want to do with the consolidation of services."

Over the next few weeks, Waluk asked for a report detailing: "Why it happened, and what they hell were they thinking."

Councilwoman Naomi Neville agreed, describing the decision to hire a business manager as, "a missed opportunity."

"This is about the accounting of the school funds and making the process more transparent," Neville said. "For some reason, it felt as if it was very much a back step" and not a step forward.

Councilor Henry F. Wintrhop also expressed his displeasure with the committee, adding that he was inclined not to support any additional funding for the school department beyond what was budgeted for last year.

That could come as a blow to the school administration, who had asked for roughly $630,000 more in funding than that of last year.  

As First Ward Councilor Charles Y. Duncan observers, "If we can't consolidate our own home here, how are we supposed to do it up and down Aquidneck Island?"

June 14, 2012

Comments (5)

Comment Feed

Where is the professionalism in city government?

Waluk said, "Why it happened, and what they hell were they thinking."

I'd like to know the same about Waluk. Why did he get elected and what the hell were we thinking?

It appears council and mayor are making a lot of decisions without input from the city manager. What is her recommendation here? Why doesn't she provide some useful guidance? Something's not quite right here.

hoistthemain 335 days ago

finance

since the school budget is 2/3 of the town budget I think that it appropriate that there is some oversight outside the school. did anyone see the results of the school issue that caused the previous manager to go away?

running a huge budget on an excel is bush league btw

if i was the school system i would would want to hire someone, anyone right away before all the details of the finances got out

in general, the easy days of raise taxes, go to the state for money are over - especially with unemployment at 11%. time to be real managers at a local level and work with what you have - something they never had to do

tfred 338 days ago

Hypocrites

And digging a little deeper I discovered the city has a finance department within the utilities department. When we're they planning to consolidate those functions to save taxpayers money?

Taxpayer 338 days ago

Power Play

What a petty and pompous display by the city council after watching the video. Not exactly how you work together to move forward by shouting from a perch and pretending that you have any understanding of the functions of the school department business office since no analysis appears to have been conducted.

I watched the school committee video and they directed that the corrective action plan for the business office be reviewed and approved by the city finance director and also requested that she analyze operations and make recommendations. And the finance director was a member of the screening committee that recommended the hiring!

Ms. Napolitano definately has it right. Work together, do the analysis and make adjustments as you go forward.

Taxpayer 338 days ago

finance

Questions: How much savings will result? Why is the city council in such a rush? Why shouldn't the school department run their own finances? Was the report that scathing? It seems that many of the issues were not "financial" but "procedural". No one stole money - the director used excel instead of another system? That's a scathing issue?

I think Ms. Napolitano has it right here. Figure out the best way and move carefully.

Why should the city be trusted anymore than the school department? Is this a chance to gain power over the school ? Why would the school committee want to hand anything over to the city when the city council seems to have such antipathy toward the schools? Seems that the school department ran in the black most years until the City Council took the money away.....and now we are supposed to put our trust in those who did that?????

finance 338 days ago

Latest Tweets
    Built with Metro Publisher™