April 18, 2012

50 Washington Square

NEWPORT -- A normally procedural vote on a funding request for the state's Community Development Block Grant program, or CDBG, became an unexpected source of debate during last Wednesday's City Council meeting when Mayor Stephen C. Waluk used the opportunity to take a stand against further subsidizing the McKinney Day Shelter at 50 Washington Square.

Reserved for communities comprised of populations of low and moderate incomes through the U.S. Housing and Community Development Act, this year the city had been eligible for up to $500,000 in federal funding, with a minimum entitlement amount of $300,000.

According to the city, requests totaling $643,380 were submitted for consideration, and a final package was voted on by councilors at their April 11 meeting.

Included in the total was $10,000 for the Washington Square Corp.'s McKinney Shelter day program.

However, Waluk, citing observed problems associated with the facility and, specifically, it's status as a "wet" shelter (that is, one that doesn't require residents to refrain from alcohol), took issue with the request.

"I think that is wrong," he said, noting that he regrets voting for the allotment in the past. "Look at the Newport Police blotter, and where do you have the most problems?"

With that, he offered a motion to amend the request to eliminate the funding for the facility, and apply the amount to infrastructure improvements.

His proposal drew the support of Councilors Kathryn E. Leonard and Charles Y. Duncan, who suggested taking a $2,500 portion of the total amount requested and apply it to Turning Around Ministry, which helps low income residents find housing.

The motion, however failed to secure a majority sentiment, though it perhaps raised the topic for future discussion.

As Second Ward Councilor Justin S. McLaughlin noted, the funding for the day shelter should actually help mitigate the problems that stem from the facility by providing residents a place to go during the day.

However, he did agree that the shelter should not permit alcohol.

Ultimately, Waluk's motion failed 4-3, with Councilors Jeanne Marie Napolitano, McLaughlin, Henry F. Winthrop, and Naomi Neville opposed. The full CDBG request passed on the next vote.

April 18, 2012

Comments (33)

Comment Feed

50

why not make the building into a low income senior housing. seniors would like the option of living in town, (dont need a car), close to everything.

i dont think that the homeless need prime real estate to do what they do more than senior citizens.

tfred more than 1 years ago

"THE ETERNAL SHELTER"

Move the Shelter, end the problem. This reminds me of something, but I can't remember what, exactly. So - where do we move it, and how do we pay for this? And if that solves the problem, what else do we move (and where)?

Isn't there a better "solution" here? Couldn't we just request a police detail focus on this area - they're always hanging out at Via Via at 1:15AM, why not on lower Broadway? Or has it been decided that the shelter is a problem, all the people are in it are the cause of all the problems, and they should be put on an ocean liner and sent to Cuba?

FRED SULLIVAN more than 1 years ago

yeah, OK....

Yeah, OK, whatever....the shelter is really stellar in the middle of downtown Newport. We're convinced....(not).

resident more than 1 years ago

assumptions

tfred - the point is, if you have seen vomit or smelled urine, you have no proof of where it came from. Our fine locals and tourists piss outside and puke on the sidewalk. (And not only once a year). I live in a gentrified area up the hill from Broadway. I smell urine in my front hedges and remove beer cans and giant plastic Dunkin Donuts cups (that have been shoved into the hedges) quite often. I know damn well the people from McKinney shelter are not the culprits.Further, I walk and/or run by the bus kiosk in front of city hall almost daily. I have never seen vomit there. I have, however, smelled urine in front of the school. Unlike you, I'm not psychic so I certainly can't pinpoint who exactly peed on that lawn. I don't doubt it could be the same people who leave gifts in my hedges.

shs more than 1 years ago

st pat

st pat (i am no fan of it) is one day

50 washington is 365

tfred more than 1 years ago

st pat

i actually think the st pat day is under enforced but it is only one day a year.
50 washington is 365

tfred more than 1 years ago

vomit and urine

Broadway the day after the St paddy's parade - walking to brunch was like walking through a minefield. Our fine tourists provided that lovely experience for me. Does wonders for the appetite!

SHS more than 1 years ago

shelter

i love the smell of vomit and urine in the bus kiosk in front of city hall - guess where that come from?.

seriously there is no reason to have the shelter that close in town in a town this small - it isnt NYC size. where else to put it? walmart /casino area looks good to me

tfred more than 1 years ago

meh

I'm with SHS on this one. I have never felt unsafe on Broadway and I walk it all the time. But I still do not believe the shelter belongs there. That might seem contradictory, but so be it.

resident more than 1 years ago

Sketchy during the day!

I have lived here for 10 years and have never had that type of experience during the day on Thames street. On Broadway you have drunk people hanging out and fighting MID-DAY!!

Newport resident more than 1 years ago

staggering

That's funny, I see staggering people all along Lower Thames Street, on Bowens Wharf, etc. I also see and hear people in those areas swearing and yelling loudly. Are they all from the homeless shelter? No. Sorry but perceptions are tainted - why would a young woman feel safer amongst staggering, yelling, swearing, people on Thames Street? And how can a young woman feel threatened on a street like Broadway in Newport - which is a safe area - especially for a city this size! By the way, moving the shelter will not remove all the people you all find so "distasteful". There will always be some panhandlers, mentally troubled, addicted folks in our downtown area - folks like that are not all from the McKinny Shelter. So if the shelter were moved - where should it go? Hate to break the news, but a downtown location is the best spot for a shelter for many reasons: primarily because most homeless don't have cars, so being centrally located just makes sense in that regard. Also, it helps to be in close proximity to public transportation, walking distance to stores/doctors/etc. But you all know that is true. So again, where exactly do all you folks suggest the shelter go?

SHS more than 1 years ago

I rather just stay away from that area!!!

As a young woman I do not feel safe on Broadway at night and am not comfortable walking my children in the stroller during the day. I took my daughter to a store on Broadway recently mid-day and the people hanging out on the street were cursing, yelling and fighting with each other. My children were frightened. Why would I subject myself or my family to this, rather just stay away which is a shame! The only way it will get better is if the shelter moves!!!

Newport resident more than 1 years ago

homeless

I am sure it comes as no surprise that the reason people are homeless has to do with emotional issues mixed many times with substance abuse. You can see some of the residents staggering around Broadway. I too know some of the people who live in the shelter, and they are fine people...and they could be well served in another part of the city or island. SHS can be the voice of the homeless on the thread (very commendable), but I for one - who is very sensitive to those less fortunate- do not believe that the shelter should be in a downtown area. Sorry, it might seem heartless, but the shelter hurts downtown Newport.

taxpayer 2 more than 1 years ago

not in your backyard

I, too, am a long-time Broadway resident. I am a residential property owner in the neighborhood - I live in and am a landlord here, however, I don't own or run a commercial venue. It is disappointing to me that some people want to relocate the homeless away from their view or from their environment. The "Not in My Backyard" syndrome. As Newport citizens, should we make every single decision based on tourism? What about our neighbors who are less fortunate? Or our neighbors who live here, as opposed to those who visit here? I, for one, decided to move to Broadway so that I would be amongst the year-round residents and be amongst a more "real" environment... Away from the more touristy areas of town. Living in a real environment means living beside the homeless. I probably spend money in your establishment and I spend lots of my money all along Broadway, all year round. Do the people of 50 Washington Square bother me? Hell no, Do they keep me from entering establishments, from walking down Broadway at night/day, from feeling safe? Hell no. They are my neighbors, my aquantances, my fellow human beings. Given a choice between living next door to a homeless shelter or a home with a few partying/vomiting twenty-somethings - i'll take the homeless, hands down.

SHS more than 1 years ago

thoughts from a long-time Broadway resident...

If you don't live or work in this corner of town, then you don't "get it." If you have not been a Washington Square business owner or employee who has had to constantly deal with the transients entering your place of work--very often intoxicated, very often aggressive and volatile--disturbing and frightening your customers and staff, begging for and/or demanding free product, loitering outside and being ornery and confrontational to passersby and to one another, then you don't "get it." If you aren't accosted for cash by Broadway's ever-growing body of panhandlers every time you step outside your door--and occasionally intimidated into giving it up even after declining--then you do not "get it." I know many, many of these shelter residents personally--some by name, some by face--and many of them are wonderful, decent, respectful individuals who will smile and greet you as you pass. They may even be the majority. But there's a very visible and very vocal population that is transforming Broadway/Washington Square into a very seedy and often unsettling place to visit, for locals and tourists alike. These are the ones making headlines. They are disadvantaged human beings and should be treated with compassion and helped rather than sidestepped, this is true; but should they be housed in the center of a historical district in the center of a town that relies on tourism to survive? I don't claim to have the answer, but to be blindly altruistic and ignorant to the basic principles of economy is just foolish. I get very tired of hearing these incredulous "How could you say such heartless things about your neighbors?" responses. As the point was made the last time this argument rolled around, no one is suggesting mass euthanasia. It's just a question of what's best for the town, and whether certain support services would be better off relocated to a spot where they aren't a liability to the town, poison to its tourism, and a burden on its residents. Or maybe as Jack said previously, the operations and policies of the shelter need to be assessed to figure out why the tenants and the town as a whole are not satisfied with the current system.

Marc more than 1 years ago

another assumption

50ws - so you are saying being homeless = troublemaker and alcoholic. Wow, generalize much? And incorrectly, I might add.
Do you understand the difference between a homeless shelter and rehab center?

SHS more than 1 years ago

50ws

Surely some other amenities could be found for the homeless. Having a shelter in the middle of bars is not exactly an incentive to stop drinking and to stay out of trouble.

resident more than 1 years ago

Business Failure

Ok, not so much a failure, but I do know a business that moved partially due to the atmosphere in that part of Washington Sq. I have had nice conversations with some of the tenants of 50 Washington Sq, but was made to feel very uncomfortable by others.

Alex more than 1 years ago

correllation?

joe - so you are saying that a business fails when it is located next to 50 Washington Square? Nothing to do with the economy, right? Newport Tax Services LLC has been located there for a few years. The restaurants that have recently come and gone on Farewell most likely have failed due to the economy, lack of a liquor license and competition from the numerous other restaurants on Broadway.
Nice try, but very weak.

SHS more than 1 years ago

the corner

I feel really sorry for whoever owns the building on the corner of Farewell and Broadway, my friends and I call it "the place where businesses go to die"

joe more than 1 years ago

50WS

This stand alone is enough for me to put up a Waluk sign, next time around.

Scott more than 1 years ago

keep the shelter

I live in the neighborhood and own a lovely victorian nearby. I'm perfectly happy that the shelter is located where it is. It should be located in the center of the city/community. I walk by that building and along broadway every day and I can't for the life of me understand the heartless, ignorant, arrogant comments I'm reading here.

SHS more than 1 years ago

50 Washington Square

I used to live in that neighborhood, and when thisnshelter opened, my family encouraged me to sell my home and move away from there. I'm
Glad I did as it became much worse as time went by. The building could
Be put to much better use, especially at that location.. Let's get moving

Anna more than 1 years ago

50 Washington Square

I used to live in this neighborhood when this shelter opened for the first
Time and because of the problems from it my family encouraged me to
Sell my home and get away from it. I did this and am glad I did, as the
Problems kept increasing. This building could be used for other things,
Especially in the center of town. As a museum,an information center or
Even a hotel.

Resident more than 1 years ago

50 Washington Square

There are two separate housing types here, the shelter in the basement and the low cost apts above......the shelter is run with very rigid rules and one of them is no alcohol or obvious use of same, if a client tries to enter the shelter in a drunk state he is tossed out by the manager on duty and if he has a bed and locker it is gone as are the privileges associated with them.....Those we read about on the Police blotter are the ones who list the shelter as their last address, many have been thrown out and live on the street...... Upstairs the clients pay a small rental fee for a room with a bath and kitchen and have more freedom and no alcohol free policy, they have rented their units and are free to feel at home there.....the rules need to be changed and a night guard hired to keep the clients in line or out they go....but the rules have to be changed first

Jack more than 1 years ago

Shelter

I know it seems heartless, but the shelter hurts the downtown. There must be some place where a full time shelter could be available. Has any ever investigated any options?

Resident more than 1 years ago

WHAT ABOUT "THE COUNT" AND HIS FRIENDS?

I guess some of you don't remember "The Count" and his friends, before The McKinney Shelter. And nobody remembers the bums who would urinate next to Downing Bros. Pharmacy or in the doorway of the old Doo Wop? But it's all the Shelter's fault so let's move it, right? Where, exactly, do you plan on putting it?

Anyway, as I recall, Stephen Brady wanted to move it some years ago - what happened to that?

FRED SULLIVAN more than 1 years ago

Really...

This location has been a issue for as long as I can remember. Local businesses have had to deal with these problems for over 30 years...belligerent drunks standing outside the building and overtaking the park in Washington Square, really? Move this facility to an area outside the city limits and use the building for something beneficial.

Anom more than 1 years ago

Shelter

We need to help the homeless but the shelter should never have been located in the downtown. Never!

Resident more than 1 years ago

PINK HYPOCRISY, GLASS HOUSES

I think that's a hard line to take considering the staggering amount of drunk driving offenses/disorderly conduct issues that don't involve 50 Wash in any given year. And certain people should be very, very careful about context when singling out a group for the actions of a few. Especially after a few "administrative" vodka tonics.

FRED SULLIVAN more than 1 years ago

Chage of location

Move the services to the Sheffield or triplett schools and help the city businesses

Taxpayer more than 1 years ago

WOW..

Somebody is finally talking about the "pink" elephant in the room...!!!! About time!

Chaz more than 1 years ago

WOW!

Somebody is FINALLY talking about the "Pink" elephant in the room...!!!!

Chaz more than 1 years ago

Education Blog Header
Location Search
Latest Tweets
    Built with Metro Publisher™